Our 2016 LA Super Lawyers & Rising Stars

Kuchler Polk is pleased to announce the following members of our team who have been listed as Louisiana Super Lawyers & Rising Stars for 2016: Deb Kuchler, Janika Polk, Monique Weiner, Michele DeShazo and Lee Ziffer.

Congratulations to you all!

Below is a list of our most recently selected attorneys and the years in which they have been recognized by Super Lawyers Magazine.  Continue reading “Our 2016 LA Super Lawyers & Rising Stars”

Motion for Summary Judgment Win obo Oil Company

Monique M. Weiner and Mark E. Best won a motion for summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in a personal injury action filed against the owner of an offshore oil platform. The court agreed that the oil company owed no duty to the plaintiff and further, even if it had owed a duty, plaintiff could not show that the duty had been breached.

Multiple Motions for Summary Judgment Win

Monique M. Weiner and Mark E. Best won several motions for summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana in consolidated lawsuits arising out of an emergency shutdown and release from a natural gas compressor station. The court dismissed the toxic exposure and property damage claims of numerous plaintiffs after agreeing that none could prove causation.

Our 2015 Super Lawyers

Kuchler Polk is pleased to announce our lawyers who have been named to Louisiana Super Lawyers and Louisiana Rising Stars for 2015. All of the KP attorneys chosen this year are no stranger to the Super Lawyer/Rising Star lists. Below is a list of our most recently selected attorneys and the years in which they have been recognized by Super Lawyers Magazine.  Continue reading “Our 2015 Super Lawyers”

Monique M. Weiner – Summary Judgment Win in the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Monique Weiner’s appellate briefing, and preparation of the defense at the trial court level, resulted in the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in Keri Richard v. DuPont Company. After her termination, the plaintiff claimed that she was disabled under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA), and that DuPont had failed to accommodate her disability, resulting in a discrimination and wrongful termination claim. She also alleged that she was discriminated against because of her gender and her pregnancy. The trial court granted summary judgment as to all claims, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal, finding that no genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the plaintiff was disabled under the ADA, or whether she had proved pretext for the gender discrimination claim. The unpublished opinion can be located at 2010 WL 3852347 (C.A.5 (La.) 2010).